Opinion
No. 404.
Submitted April 10, 2006.
Decided June 29, 2006.
Appeal from the Reported below, 22 AD3d 998.
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that appellant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.22 (b) (2) of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals ( 22 NYCRR 500.22 [b] [2]). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.