From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

David Lapidus v. Capital Neon Sign Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 10, 1939
170 Misc. 489 (N.Y. App. Term 1939)

Opinion

February 10, 1939.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, First District.

Kamer Kamer [ Frank Kamer of counsel], for the appellant.

Emma Haber, for the respondent.


The mere naming of a person as managing agent of a corporation, where the answering affidavit denies control over the person sought to be examined, is insufficient for the granting of an order to examine the named person as such agent.

Judgment and orders reversed, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice to renewal of application for examination of appellant.

All concur. Present — HAMMER, SHIENTAG and NOONAN, JJ.


Summaries of

David Lapidus v. Capital Neon Sign Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 10, 1939
170 Misc. 489 (N.Y. App. Term 1939)
Case details for

David Lapidus v. Capital Neon Sign Corp.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID LAPIDUS, Respondent, v. CAPITAL NEON SIGN CORP., Appellant, and LE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Feb 10, 1939

Citations

170 Misc. 489 (N.Y. App. Term 1939)
10 N.Y.S.2d 441