From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daverso v. Romeo, Kerr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 10, 1982
89 A.D.2d 1054 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

September 10, 1982

Appeal from the Onondaga Supreme Court, Aloi, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and Moule, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioners appeal from an order of Special Term which denied their application for an order validating their petition for an opportunity to ballot. The failure of the subscribing witness to the petition to date his signature renders the petition invalid (see Election Law, § 6-132; Matter of Sortino v Chiavaroli, 42 N.Y.2d 982). The subscribing witness' affidavit which supplied the missing date does not cure the fatal defect since it was filed after the last day provided by law for filing the petition ( Matter of Sortino v Chiavaroli, supra).


Summaries of

Daverso v. Romeo, Kerr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 10, 1982
89 A.D.2d 1054 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Daverso v. Romeo, Kerr

Case Details

Full title:ALFRED J. DAVERSO et al., Appellants, v. RICHARD A. ROMEO et al., as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 10, 1982

Citations

89 A.D.2d 1054 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

Avella v. Johnson

Nor is the error in the date incurable, since we have held that otherwise fatal errors can be corrected and…