From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davalloo v. Kaplan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 7, 2020
16 CV 9342 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 7, 2020)

Opinion

16 CV 9342 (VB)

01-07-2020

SHEILA DAVALLOO, Petitioner, v. SABINA KAPLAN, Superintendent, Bedford Hills Correctional Facility, Respondent.


AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF OCTOBER 18 , 2019

The Court amends its October 18, 2019, Memorandum Opinion and Order (Doc. #37), as follows: As petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d. Cir. 2005).

In addition, the Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith; therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

The Clerk is instructed to mail a copy of this Order to petitioner at the address on the docket. Dated: January 7, 2020

White Plains, NY

SO ORDERED:

/s/_________

Vincent L. Briccetti

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Davalloo v. Kaplan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 7, 2020
16 CV 9342 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 7, 2020)
Case details for

Davalloo v. Kaplan

Case Details

Full title:SHEILA DAVALLOO, Petitioner, v. SABINA KAPLAN, Superintendent, Bedford…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jan 7, 2020

Citations

16 CV 9342 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 7, 2020)