From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dasilva v. Storz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 15, 2002
290 A.D.2d 288 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

5521

January 15, 2002.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe III, J.), entered June 27, 2000, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, and the complaint reinstated.

M. SEAN DUFFY, for plaintiff-appellant.

MONTE J. ROSENSTEIN, for defendants-respondents.

Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Rubin, Buckley, Friedman, JJ.


Plaintiff was injured when a vehicle in which she was a passenger left the roadway and struck a telephone pole. Supreme Court, finding that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury for purposes of Insurance Law § 5102(d), granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. We reverse.

In opposing defendants' motion, plaintiff's experts opined that plaintiff suffered bulging and herniated discs causally related to the accident, that these injuries were permanent, and that plaintiff's injuries resulted in a significant and quantified limitation in her range of motion. In view of this, Supreme Court could not conclude, as a matter of law, that plaintiff had not suffered a serious injury (Lesser v. Smart Cab Corp., 283 A.D.2d 273, 274; Moore v. Tappen, 242 A.D.2d 526, 527). Accordingly, defendants' motion should have been denied.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Dasilva v. Storz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 15, 2002
290 A.D.2d 288 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Dasilva v. Storz

Case Details

Full title:DIANA DASILVA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT v. EUGENE RONALD STORZ, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 15, 2002

Citations

290 A.D.2d 288 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
735 N.Y.S.2d 548

Citing Cases

Woodhouse v. Burrowes

These positive clinical and test results are indicative of serious injury ( see Brown v. Achy, 9 AD3d 30,…

Morris v. Ilya Cab Corp.

Defendants established a prima facie case that plaintiffs did not suffer serious injuries within the meaning…