From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Darwin v. State

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Sep 17, 2015
No. 10-15-00304-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 17, 2015)

Opinion

No. 10-15-00304-CR

09-17-2015

RONALD EUGENE DARWIN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


From the 21st District Court Burleson County, Texas
Trial Court No. 14,101

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Ronald Eugene Darwin appeals the trial court's denial of Darwin's "Motion for Judgement Nunc Pro Tunc on Pre-Sentence Time Credit." However, the trial court's denial of that motion is not an appealable order, and this Court has no jurisdiction of an appeal from that order. Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism'd); see also Ex parte Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d 147, 148-49 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (appeal of denial of nunc pro tunc is by way of a petition for writ of mandamus). Accordingly, Darwin's appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

A motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days after the judgment of this Court is rendered. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. If the appellant desires to have the dedsion of this Court reviewed by filing a petition for discretionary review, that petition must be filed with the Court of Criminal Appeals within 30 days after either the day this Court's judgment was rendered or the day the last timely motion for rehearing was overruled by this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2(a). --------

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins
Appeal dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed September 17, 2015
Do not publish
[CR25]


Summaries of

Darwin v. State

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Sep 17, 2015
No. 10-15-00304-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 17, 2015)
Case details for

Darwin v. State

Case Details

Full title:RONALD EUGENE DARWIN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Sep 17, 2015

Citations

No. 10-15-00304-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 17, 2015)