Summary
holding that the plaintiff's confinement in disciplinary segregation for forty and fifty days was not a condition of confinement "atypical to the ordinary incidents of prison life"
Summary of this case from Walker v. FirmanOpinion
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01559-REB-CBS
2013-09-17
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF THE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Blackburn, J.
The matter before me is the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#74], filed August 29, 2013. No objection having been filed to the recommendation, I review it for plain error only. See Morales-Fernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 418 F.3d 1116, 1122 (10th Cir. 2005). Finding no such error in the magistrate judge's recommended disposition, I find and conclude that the recommendation should be approved and adopted.
"[#74]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.
This standard pertains even though plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter. Morales-Fernandez, 418 F.3d at 1122. In addition, because plaintiff is proceeding pro se, I have construed his pleadings more liberally and held them to a less stringent standard than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94, 127 S. Ct. 2197, 2200, 167 L.Ed.2d 1081 (2007); Andrews v. Heaton, 483 F.3d 1070, 1076 (10th Cir. 2007); Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991) (citing Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct. 594, 595-96, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972)).
--------
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#74], filed August 29, 2013, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court;
2. That defendants' Motion To Dismiss and for Partial Summary Judgment [#45], filed January 4, 2013, is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED AS MOOT IN PART, as follows:
a. That the motion is GRANTED insofar as it seeks dismissal of plaintiff's claims for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and
b. That in all other respects, the motion is DENIED AS MOOT;
3. That plaintiff's Claims One, Two, Three, Four, and Five against all defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and
4. That judgment without prejudice SHALL ENTER on behalf of defendants, D/S Mazzei (misnamed in the caption as "D/S Mazzaie"), D/S Keenan, D/S Blair, D/S McCall, and Sheriff Gary Willson, and against plaintiff, Stephan Darris.
Dated September 17, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
________________________
Robert E. Blackburn
United States District Judge