From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Darnes v. Ellis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 23, 2018
No. 2:17-cv-2170 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2018)

Opinion

No. 2:17-cv-2170 KJN P

01-23-2018

TAMICA NICOLE DARNES, Plaintiff, v. JOHN B. ELLIS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER & FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed December 13, 2017, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall assign a district judge to this action; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: January 23, 2018

/s/_________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dar2170.fta


Summaries of

Darnes v. Ellis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 23, 2018
No. 2:17-cv-2170 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2018)
Case details for

Darnes v. Ellis

Case Details

Full title:TAMICA NICOLE DARNES, Plaintiff, v. JOHN B. ELLIS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 23, 2018

Citations

No. 2:17-cv-2170 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2018)