From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Darling & Co. v. De Addio

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 16, 1953
204 F.2d 272 (6th Cir. 1953)

Opinion

No. 11738.

April 16, 1953.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio; Paul Jones, Judge.

Duncan Thomas, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

Motz, Morris, Wilson Quine, Akron, Ohio, and McConnell, Blackmore, Cory Burke, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.


The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised.

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed in accordance with the reasons set forth by the District Court in its opinion filed, 112 F. Supp. 166, denying a motion for a new trial.


Summaries of

Darling & Co. v. De Addio

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 16, 1953
204 F.2d 272 (6th Cir. 1953)
Case details for

Darling & Co. v. De Addio

Case Details

Full title:DARLING COMPANY, Appellant, v. John DE ADDIO, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Apr 16, 1953

Citations

204 F.2d 272 (6th Cir. 1953)