From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Danjou v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jun 15, 2017
No. 71263 (Nev. Jun. 15, 2017)

Opinion

No. 71263

06-15-2017

GASTON JOSEPH DANJOU, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying appellant's postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michael Villani, Judge.

We conclude that a response to the pro se brief is not necessary. NRAP 46A(c). This appeal therefore has been submitted for decision based on the pro se brief and the record. See NRAP 34(f)(3).

Appellant's petition alleged that the Nevada Revised Statutes are unconstitutional. The district court denied his petition because it was not in substantial compliance with the provisions set forth in NRS 34.735. We have reviewed the documents on file with this court and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. See NRS 34.724(2)(a); NRS 34.735. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, J.

Hardesty /s/_________, J.
Parraguirre /s/_________, J.
Stiglich cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge

Gaston Joseph Danjou

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Danjou v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jun 15, 2017
No. 71263 (Nev. Jun. 15, 2017)
Case details for

Danjou v. State

Case Details

Full title:GASTON JOSEPH DANJOU, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 15, 2017

Citations

No. 71263 (Nev. Jun. 15, 2017)