From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Danielson v. Danielson

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jan 8, 2015
NO. 02-14-00219-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 8, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 02-14-00219-CV

01-08-2015

GARY STEVEN DANIELSON APPELLANT v. APRIL MARIE DANIELSON APPELLEE


FROM THE 231ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
TRIAL COURT NO. 231-551313-14
MEMORANDUM OPINIONAND JUDGMENT

On October 29, 2014, we received appellant's "Request For Additional Time" to file the brief. The motion did not comply with the Tex. R. App. P. 9.1, 9.5, and 10.1(a)(5). On October 30, 2014, we requested an amended motion by November 10, 2014. No motion was received.

On December 2, 2014, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J. DELIVERED: January 8, 2015

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Danielson v. Danielson

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jan 8, 2015
NO. 02-14-00219-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 8, 2015)
Case details for

Danielson v. Danielson

Case Details

Full title:GARY STEVEN DANIELSON APPELLANT v. APRIL MARIE DANIELSON APPELLEE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Jan 8, 2015

Citations

NO. 02-14-00219-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 8, 2015)