From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 25, 2014
CRIM. NO. 2:11-CR-00108 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 25, 2014)

Opinion

CRIM. NO. 2:11-CR-00108 CASE NO. 2:12-CV-1067

04-25-2014

GREGORY DANIELS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


JUDGE MICHAEL H. WATSON

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers


OPINION AND ORDER

On April 2, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that counsel be appointed on Petitioner's behalf to represent him on the claim regarding defense counsel's failure to advise him regarding the entrapment defense. Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed.

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Counsel has already been appointed on Petitioner's behalf to represent him at an evidentiary hearing on his claim regarding counsel's alleged failure to advise him regarding the entrapment defense.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________________

Michael H. Watson, Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Daniels v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 25, 2014
CRIM. NO. 2:11-CR-00108 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 25, 2014)
Case details for

Daniels v. United States

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY DANIELS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 25, 2014

Citations

CRIM. NO. 2:11-CR-00108 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 25, 2014)