From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. United Auto.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Sep 24, 2012
Case No. 12-61577-Civ-SCOLA (S.D. Fla. Sep. 24, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 12-61577-Civ-SCOLA

09-24-2012

JAMIE DANIELS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE, AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 2278, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO DISMISS AS MOOT

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss [ECF Nos. 7, 8], filed on September 10, 2012. Subsequently, on September 21, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 11].

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) allows a party to amend the pleadings "once as a matter of course" if done within "21 days after service of a responsive pleading or 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b)," whichever comes first. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). "For purposes of this Rule, a motion to dismiss is not a responsive pleading." Williams v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. Sys. of Ga., 477 F.3d 1282, 1291 (11th Cir. 2007).

Here, the Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint eleven days after Defendants filed their separate Motions to Dismiss. Therefore, Plaintiff's amendment must be allowed as a matter of course, and does not require permission from the Court. "When the plaintiff has the right to file an amended complaint as a matter of course," which is the case here, "the plain language of Rule 15(a) shows that the court lacks the discretion to reject the amended complaint[.]" See id. at 1293 n.6 (emphasis original).

Further, because Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint supersedes the prior Complaint, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the original Complaint is now moot. See Taylor v. Alabama, 275 F. App'x 836, 838 (Cir. 11th 2008) (noting that when "Plaintiffs amended their complaint," the "Defendants' motion to dismiss became moot").

Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Defendants' two Motions to Dismiss [ECF Nos. 7, 8] are DENIED AS MOOT, in light of the newly-filed First Amended Complaint. The Defendants shall file a response to the First Amended Complaint no later than October 12, 2012.

DONE and ORDERED in chambers, at Miami, Florida September 24, 2012.

_______________

ROBERT N. SCOLA , JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies to:
U.S. Magistrate Judge
Counsel of record


Summaries of

Daniels v. United Auto.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Sep 24, 2012
Case No. 12-61577-Civ-SCOLA (S.D. Fla. Sep. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Daniels v. United Auto.

Case Details

Full title:JAMIE DANIELS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE, AND…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Date published: Sep 24, 2012

Citations

Case No. 12-61577-Civ-SCOLA (S.D. Fla. Sep. 24, 2012)