From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. Tex. Workforce Comm'n

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Sep 15, 2023
Civil Action 4:23-CV-691-P (N.D. Tex. Sep. 15, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 4:23-CV-691-P

09-15-2023

BRIAUNNA DANIELS, v. TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION


FINDING, CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JEFFREY L. CURETON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On July 13,2023, the Court entered an order requiring Plaintiff Briaunna Daniels to register as an electronic case (“ECF”) filer no later than July 27, 2023. ECF 4. On September 1. 2023, the Court entered a second order requiring Plaintiff to register as an ECF filer no later than September 14, 2023. ECF 5. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has failed to register as an ECF filer.

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs case be DISMISSED for failure to comply with the local rules.

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO OBJECT TO PROPOSED FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION AND CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE TO OBJECT

Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), each party to this action has the right to serve and file specific written objections in the United States District Court to the United States Magistrate Judge's proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation within fourteen (14) days after the party has been served with a copy of this document. The United States District Judge need only make a de novo determination of those portions of the United States Magistrate Judge's proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation to which specific objection is timely made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Failure to file, by the date stated above, a specific written objection to a proposed factual finding or legal conclusion will bar a party, except upon grounds of plain error or manifest injustice, from attacking on appeal any such proposed factual findings and legal conclusions accepted by the United States District Judge. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded by statute on other grounds, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending time to file objections from ten to fourteen days).

ORDER

Under 28 U.S.C. § 636, it is hereby ORDERED that each party is granted until September 29, 2023, to serve and file written objections to the United States Magistrate Judge's proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation. It is further ORDERED that if objections are filed and the opposing party chooses to file a response, the response shall be filed within seven (7) days of the filing date of the objections.

It is further ORDERED that the above-styled and numbered action, previously referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for findings, conclusions, and recommendation, be and hereby is returned to the docket for the United States District Judge.


Summaries of

Daniels v. Tex. Workforce Comm'n

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Sep 15, 2023
Civil Action 4:23-CV-691-P (N.D. Tex. Sep. 15, 2023)
Case details for

Daniels v. Tex. Workforce Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:BRIAUNNA DANIELS, v. TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Sep 15, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 4:23-CV-691-P (N.D. Tex. Sep. 15, 2023)