Opinion
Ben Daniels, Plaintiff, Pro se, Signal Hill, CA.
Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
The Honorable Jay C. Gandhi, United States Magistrate Judge.
On August 29, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint (" SAC") pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against defendants the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department Medical Services Bureau, Commander Ralph G. Ornelas, and ten John Doe Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department employees (the " Doe Defendants").
On April 13, 2015, the Court issued an Order Regarding Service of Process (" Service Order"). The Service Order required Plaintiff to submit a Notice of Submission (" Notice") by May 13, 2015, informing the Court that he had complied with the Service Order.
As of today's date, the Court has yet to receive the Notice from Plaintiff.
Accordingly, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or comply with a court order. Plaintiff is cautioned that his failure to timely file a response to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed by the Court as consent to the dismissal of this action without prejudice. If Petitioner files the Notice within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, then this Order to Show Cause shall be automatically discharged.
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED TO attach a copy of the Service Order [Dkt. No. 41] to this Order.