From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. Sheffer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 25, 1977
56 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

February 25, 1977

Appeal from the Erie Supreme Court.

Present — Marsh, P.J., Moule, Cardamone, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: Plaintiffs moved to require defendants to produce for discovery, inspection and copying all pathology slides, tissue material removed from plaintiff Leona Daniels and X-ray films concerning said plaintiff. The notice to produce, pursuant to CPLR 3120 (subd [a], par 2) served upon defendants specified that the place of the inspection should be the offices of plaintiffs' attorneys. The material not having been received, plaintiffs made their motion which is the subject of this appeal. Defendants made no objection in writing and there is a complete absence of any reason in the record why there should not be compliance with the notice to produce. Notwithstanding these circumstances, Special Term ordered that the inspection and examination take place at the defendant Deaconess Hospital. This was an improper exercise of the court's discretion.


Summaries of

Daniels v. Sheffer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 25, 1977
56 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

Daniels v. Sheffer

Case Details

Full title:LEONA DANIELS et al., Appellants, v. JOHN B. SHEFFER et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 25, 1977

Citations

56 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Citing Cases

Spratt v. Rochelson

In that manner, plaintiffs would have been afforded an opportunity to voice their objections prior to…

Martin v. County of Monroe

We reverse. While the better practice would have been for plaintiff to proceed in her discovery by means of a…