Daniels v. Olin Corporation

Full title: MARK DANIELS, et al. Plaintiffs, v. OLIN CORPORATION, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Oct 5, 2005

Case No. C 03-01211 RMW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. C 03-01211 RMW.

October 5, 2005

RICHARD ALEXANDER, JEFFREY W. RICKARD, RYAN M. HAGAN, ALEXANDER, HAWES AUDET, LLP, San Jose, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff(s).

RANDALL C. CREECH, CREECH, LIEBOW KRAUS, San Jose, CA, THOMAS M. CARNEY, admitted pro hac vice, CAROL A. RUTTER, admitted pro hac vice, HUSCH EPPENBERGER, LLC, St. Louis, MO, Attorneys for Defendant Olin Corporation.

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT OLIN CORPORATION BY PLAINTIFF SUE McELWAINE

RONALD WHYTE, District Judge

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2), Plaintiff Sue McElwaine and Defendant Olin Corporation hereby request that this Court, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2), enter an Order dismissing with prejudice all claims asserted by Plaintiff Sue McElwaine as to defendant Olin Corporation All parties to bear their own costs and legal fees incurred to date in this action.

THIS MATTER coming on the motion of Plaintiff Sue McElwaine and Defendant Olin Corporation, for an order of dismissal with prejudice against the defendant OLIN CORPORATION, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2):

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED.

Plaintiff Sue McElwaine's claims against Defendant Olin Corporation are dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(2). Each party shall bear their own costs and legal fees incurred to date in this action.

SO ORDERED.