From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. Lumpkin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
Dec 17, 2020
Civil Action No. 7:19-cv-076-O-BP (N.D. Tex. Dec. 17, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:19-cv-076-O-BP

12-17-2020

ERICK DANIELS, TDCJ No. 01992750, Petitioner, v. BOBBY LUMPKIN, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This is a habeas action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in which Petitioner challenges the validity of disciplinary action taken against him at the James V. Allred Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice in Iowa Park, Texas. See Petition, ECF No. 2 at 4.

The United States Magistrate Judge entered his Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation in which he recommends that the petition be denied. See ECF No. 11. Petitioner did not file objections. The District Court reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, I am of the opinion that the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and reasons for denial set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation are correct and they are hereby adopted and incorporated by reference as the Findings of the Court.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.

SO ORDERED this 17th day of December, 2020.

/s/ _________

Reed O'Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Daniels v. Lumpkin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
Dec 17, 2020
Civil Action No. 7:19-cv-076-O-BP (N.D. Tex. Dec. 17, 2020)
Case details for

Daniels v. Lumpkin

Case Details

Full title:ERICK DANIELS, TDCJ No. 01992750, Petitioner, v. BOBBY LUMPKIN, Director…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

Date published: Dec 17, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:19-cv-076-O-BP (N.D. Tex. Dec. 17, 2020)