From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniele v. Missouri Dept. of Conservation

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
May 3, 2011
347 S.W.3d 486 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. ED95037.

May 3, 2011.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Honorable Sandra Parragut-Hemphill, Judge.

Stephen B. Evans, Katherine E. Hummel, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Kenneth J. Heinz, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.



ORDER


The plaintiffs, Anthony and Beth Daniele, appeal the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County against them and in favor of the defendant, the Missouri Department of Conservation, on the Department's counterclaim for breach of agreement. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the trial court's judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(5).


Summaries of

Daniele v. Missouri Dept. of Conservation

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
May 3, 2011
347 S.W.3d 486 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

Daniele v. Missouri Dept. of Conservation

Case Details

Full title:Anthony DANIELE and Beth Daniele, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: May 3, 2011

Citations

347 S.W.3d 486 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)