From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniel v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Feb 26, 1929
120 So. 924 (Ala. Crim. App. 1929)

Opinion

8 Div. 716.

February 26, 1929.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lawrence County; James E. Horton, Judge.

G. O. Chenault, of Decatur, for appellant.

Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.


Appellant was convicted of the offense of burglary. The court has read the entire evidence, sitting en banc. We are of the opinion that it fails, by any legal tendency, to connect the appellant with the commission of the offense charged. For that reason, the general affirmative charge in his favor, duly requested, should have been given to the jury, and, for the error in its refusal, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Daniel v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Feb 26, 1929
120 So. 924 (Ala. Crim. App. 1929)
Case details for

Daniel v. State

Case Details

Full title:Marcus DANIEL v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Feb 26, 1929

Citations

120 So. 924 (Ala. Crim. App. 1929)
23 Ala. App. 619