From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniel v. Optical

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 29, 2019
No. 3:19-cv-1740-S (N.D. Tex. Oct. 29, 2019)

Opinion

No. 3:19-cv-1740-S

10-29-2019

DAVID DANIEL, SR., Plaintiff, v. HOYA OPTICAL, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED.

SIGNED October 29, 2019.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Daniel v. Optical

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 29, 2019
No. 3:19-cv-1740-S (N.D. Tex. Oct. 29, 2019)
Case details for

Daniel v. Optical

Case Details

Full title:DAVID DANIEL, SR., Plaintiff, v. HOYA OPTICAL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Oct 29, 2019

Citations

No. 3:19-cv-1740-S (N.D. Tex. Oct. 29, 2019)