From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniel v. Novastar Mort.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jul 29, 2004
No. 02-02-147-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 29, 2004)

Opinion

No. 02-02-147-CV

Delivered: July 29, 2004.

Appeal from County Court at Law of Wise County.

Clay Roark, Roark Law Firm, P.C., Arlington, TX, for appellants (Michael L. Daniel and Denise E. Daniel).

Christopher Baxter, Baxter Schwartz, P.C., Houston, TX, for appellee (Novastar Mortgage, Inc.).

PANEL D: HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


We have considered "Appellants' Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice." It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

Daniel v. Novastar Mort.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jul 29, 2004
No. 02-02-147-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 29, 2004)
Case details for

Daniel v. Novastar Mort.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL L. DANIEL AND DENISE E. DANIEL, Appellants v. NOVASTAR MORTGAGE…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Jul 29, 2004

Citations

No. 02-02-147-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 29, 2004)