From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniel v. Erdos

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 2, 2020
CASE NO.: 1:18-cv-1661 (N.D. Ohio Jun. 2, 2020)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 1:18-cv-1661

06-02-2020

JAMES DANIEL, Petitioner, v. WARDEN RONALD ERDOS, Respondent.


ORDER AND DECISION

The Court has examined the Report and Recommended Decision of Magistrate Judge Knepp, submitted in this matter on April 20, 2020. Doc. 10. Upon due consideration, and no objections having been filed by the parties, the Court adopts the Report and recommended findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and incorporates them herein. Therefore, it is ordered that petition is hereby DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that Petitioner may not take an appeal from the Court's decision in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

June 2, 2020

/s/ John R . Adams

JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Daniel v. Erdos

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 2, 2020
CASE NO.: 1:18-cv-1661 (N.D. Ohio Jun. 2, 2020)
Case details for

Daniel v. Erdos

Case Details

Full title:JAMES DANIEL, Petitioner, v. WARDEN RONALD ERDOS, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 2, 2020

Citations

CASE NO.: 1:18-cv-1661 (N.D. Ohio Jun. 2, 2020)

Citing Cases

United States v. Boukamp

, report and recommendation adopted, No. 1:18-CV-1661, 2020 WL 2934815 (N.D. Ohio June 3, 2020); United…