From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dangelo v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 11, 2013
Case No. 2:12-CV-00586-MMD-PAL (D. Nev. Jan. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-CV-00586-MMD-PAL

01-11-2013

FLORENCE DANGELO, individually, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, DOES I-X, and ROE CORPORATIONS I-X, inclusive, Defendants.

DARREN T. BRENNER Nevada Bar No. 8386 LINDSAY C. DEMAREE Nevada Bar No. 11949 LEWIS AND ROCA, LLP Attorneys for Defendant Hartford Casualty Insurance Company


DARREN T. BRENNER
Nevada Bar No. 8386
LINDSAY C. DEMAREE
Nevada Bar No. 11949
LEWIS AND ROCA, LLP
Attorneys for Defendant Hartford Casualty Insurance Company

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED TO, by and between plaintiff Florence Dangelo and defendant Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, through their respective counsel of record, that the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice.

Each party to bear their own fees and costs. HENNES & HAIGHT BY: ____________

David J. Martin

Nevada Bar No. 9117

8972 Spanish Ridge Avenue

Las Vegas, NV 89148

Attorneys for Plaintiff

LEWIS AND ROCA LLP

BY: ____________

Darren T. Brenner

Nevada Bar No. 8386

Lindsay Demaree

Nevada Bar No. 11949

3993 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Ste. 600

Las Vegas, Nevada 89109

Attorneys for Defendant Harford Casualty

Insurance Company

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Dangelo v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 11, 2013
Case No. 2:12-CV-00586-MMD-PAL (D. Nev. Jan. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Dangelo v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:FLORENCE DANGELO, individually, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 11, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-CV-00586-MMD-PAL (D. Nev. Jan. 11, 2013)