From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dangaard v. Instagram, LLC

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 29, 2024
22-cv-01101-WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 29, 2024)

Opinion

22-cv-01101-WHA

05-29-2024

DAWN DANGAARD, KELLY GILBERT, JENNIFER ALBAUGH, and all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. INSTAGRAM, LLC, FACEBOOK OPERATIONS, LLC, META PLATFORMS, INC., and JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is hereby DENIED. This order finds no reason to apply a different rule for cases originally filed in federal court and depart from our court of appeal's holding in United Steel v. Shell Oil, 602 F.3d 1087, 1091 (9th Cir. 2010). The risk of forum-shopping and manipulation is just as great.

This order need not reach the issue of whether or not the district judge has discretion to dismiss this case or continue with the case, i.e., treating the matter as under the rubric of supplemental jurisdiction (or not). In this instance, so much time and effort has been put into the case, that the undersigned judge will decide this matter on the merits.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dangaard v. Instagram, LLC

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 29, 2024
22-cv-01101-WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 29, 2024)
Case details for

Dangaard v. Instagram, LLC

Case Details

Full title:DAWN DANGAARD, KELLY GILBERT, JENNIFER ALBAUGH, and all other similarly…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 29, 2024

Citations

22-cv-01101-WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 29, 2024)