From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dang v. BWW Law Group

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 24, 2013
544 F. App'x 205 (4th Cir. 2013)

Summary

recognizing and applying two-prong test

Summary of this case from Vieira v. Simpson

Opinion

No. 13-1740

10-24-2013

In re: BARBARA KIM DANG, Debtor, BARBARA KIM DANG, Debtor - Appellant, v. BWW LAW GROUP, f/k/a Bierman, Geesing & Ward, LLC; QUICKEN LOANS; ONE WEST BANK, f/k/a Indy Mac Bank, FSB; DEUTCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY; DB INDX 2006-AR27; HOWARD N. BIERMAN; JACOB GEESING; CARRIE M. WARD; BIERMAN, GEESING & WARD, LLC; DOES 1-200, Defendants - Appellees, ELLEN W. COSBY, Trustee - Appellee.

Barbara Kim Dang, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Daniel Cohen, BIERMAN GEESING WARD & WOOD, LLC, Bethesda, Maryland; Joseph Yenouskas, Daniel E. Zytnick, GOODWIN & PROCTER, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Catherine Keller Hopkin, TYDINGS & ROSENBERG, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Adam M. Lynn, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, Easton, Maryland; James Burton Travis, Crofton, Maryland; Ellen W. Cosby, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:12-cv-03342-RDB) Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barbara Kim Dang, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Daniel Cohen, BIERMAN GEESING WARD & WOOD, LLC, Bethesda, Maryland; Joseph Yenouskas, Daniel E. Zytnick, GOODWIN & PROCTER, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Catherine Keller Hopkin, TYDINGS & ROSENBERG, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Adam M. Lynn, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, Easton, Maryland; James Burton Travis, Crofton, Maryland; Ellen W. Cosby, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Barbara Kim Dang appeals from the district court's order dismissing her adversary proceeding that was filed in the bankruptcy court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dang v. BWW Law Group, No. 1:12-cv-03342-RDB (D. Md. Apr. 17, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Dang v. BWW Law Group

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 24, 2013
544 F. App'x 205 (4th Cir. 2013)

recognizing and applying two-prong test

Summary of this case from Vieira v. Simpson
Case details for

Dang v. BWW Law Group

Case Details

Full title:In re: BARBARA KIM DANG, Debtor, BARBARA KIM DANG, Debtor - Appellant, v…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 24, 2013

Citations

544 F. App'x 205 (4th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Vieira v. Simpson

Id. at 482, 487. Courts apply a two-prong test to determine whether a bankruptcy court may constitutionally…