From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daneshvar v. Daryl R. Kipke, Neuronexus Techs., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 19, 2018
2017-2515 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 19, 2018)

Opinion

2017-2515

11-19-2018

EUGENE D. DANESHVAR, Plaintiff-Appellant v. DARYL R. KIPKE, NEURONEXUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants-Appellees

WILLIAM ALCIATI, Gardella Grace PA, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by GREG GARDELLA. J. MICHAEL HUGET, Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP, Ann Arbor, MI, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by SARAH E. WAIDELICH.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in No. 2:13-cv-13096-SJM-APP, Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III.

JUDGMENT

WILLIAM ALCIATI, Gardella Grace PA, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by GREG GARDELLA. J. MICHAEL HUGET, Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP, Ann Arbor, MI, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by SARAH E. WAIDELICH. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, WALLACH, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 19, 2018

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Daneshvar v. Daryl R. Kipke, Neuronexus Techs., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 19, 2018
2017-2515 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 19, 2018)
Case details for

Daneshvar v. Daryl R. Kipke, Neuronexus Techs., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE D. DANESHVAR, Plaintiff-Appellant v. DARYL R. KIPKE, NEURONEXUS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 19, 2018

Citations

2017-2515 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 19, 2018)