From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dan G. Bach v. Adam

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
May 19, 2017
NO. 03-03-00412-CV (Tex. App. May. 19, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 03-03-00412-CV

05-19-2017

Dan G. Bach and DGB Technologies, Inc., Appellants v. Steven L. Adam, Appellee


FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY
NO. 266,343-A, HONORABLE ORLINDA NARANJO, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

This Court abated this appeal in 2005 after receiving notice of a related bankruptcy. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.1, 8.2. After the abatement, no party to this appeal sought reinstatement. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.3. We have now been informed that the bankruptcy case related to this appeal is closed and, therefore, have reinstated the appeal.

On October 27, 2016, the Clerk of this Court sent notice to the parties that this appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless a status report was filed on or before November 7, 2016, that provided reason to retain this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). To date, no response has been filed. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

/s/_________

Scott K. Field, Justice Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Puryear and Field Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: May 19, 2017


Summaries of

Dan G. Bach v. Adam

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
May 19, 2017
NO. 03-03-00412-CV (Tex. App. May. 19, 2017)
Case details for

Dan G. Bach v. Adam

Case Details

Full title:Dan G. Bach and DGB Technologies, Inc., Appellants v. Steven L. Adam…

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: May 19, 2017

Citations

NO. 03-03-00412-CV (Tex. App. May. 19, 2017)