From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D'Amico v. City of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 16, 1981
79 A.D.2d 1091 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

January 16, 1981

Appeal from the Monroe Supreme Court.

Present — Simmons, J.P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.


Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: The order is modified by dismissing the fourth cause of action as against Sheriff Lombard. It is well established that the Sheriff is not liable for the acts of his deputies in the performance of their criminal duties (see Barr v. County of Albany, 50 N.Y.2d 247, 257; Matter of Flaherty v. Milliken, 193 N.Y. 564, 569). Special Term dismissed the fourth cause of action as against the county upon stipulation by plaintiffs. We note in affirming the denial of the motion to dismiss with respect to the sixth cause of action that the complaint is broad enough to embrace allegations of direct liability on the part of the county for negligence in supervising the jail, hiring and training employees, and promulgating rules and regulations. There is no legal impediment to plaintiffs' recovery on this theory.


Summaries of

D'Amico v. City of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 16, 1981
79 A.D.2d 1091 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

D'Amico v. City of Rochester

Case Details

Full title:PETER J. D'AMICO, as Parent and Natural Guardian of His Infant Son, PAUL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 16, 1981

Citations

79 A.D.2d 1091 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Sponable

SHERIFF'S LIABILITY Considering first the grounds for liability against the Sheriff, it is well settled that…

Douglas v. County of Oswego

It may be fairly inferred from the distinctions emphasized by the Delosh court that the county would be found…