From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dallas South Mill, Inc. v. Kaolin Mushroom Farms, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Mar 29, 2006
Civil Action No. 3: 05-CV-1890-B (N.D. Tex. Mar. 29, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3: 05-CV-1890-B.

March 29, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Before the Court is Defendants Kaolin Mushroom Farms, Inc., South Mill Mushroom Sales, Inc., John Pia, Michael Pia, Mark Moran, and Brian Zary's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint (doc. 121), filed March 28, 2006. In their Motion, Defendants ask the Court to dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint by incorporating all the reasoning included in their Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Original Complaint. (Defs. Mot. p. 3) Defendants also assert that Plaintiffs did not seek leave to amend their Complaint, and thus, the Court should not consider it. ( Id. at p. 2) To the extent Defendants assert the Amended Complaint was filed without leave, the Court DENIES their Motion. The Court will, however, consider Defendants' argument in their initial Motions to Dismiss as applied to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint.

Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits one amendment of a pleading without leave of Court at any time before a responsive pleading is served. Here, Defendants had filed Motions to Dismiss and Motions to Stay at the time Plaintiffs amended their Complaint, but the Fifth Circuit is clear that a motion to dismiss is not considered a "responsive pleading" under Rule 15 that would cut off the right to amend. McKinney v. Irving Indep. Sch. Dist., 309 F.3d 308, 315 (5th Cir. 2004). Defendants' citation to a footnote of an unpublished district court case in support of their argument is neither persuasive nor binding. As such, the Court follows the Fifth Circuit, and DENIES Defendants' Motion to the extent they seek dismissal due to Plaintiffs' amendment of their Complaint without leave of Court. The Court will, however, apply the arguments contained in Defendants' original Motions to Dismiss to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dallas South Mill, Inc. v. Kaolin Mushroom Farms, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Mar 29, 2006
Civil Action No. 3: 05-CV-1890-B (N.D. Tex. Mar. 29, 2006)
Case details for

Dallas South Mill, Inc. v. Kaolin Mushroom Farms, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DALLAS SOUTH MILL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. KAOLIN MUSHROOM FARMS…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Mar 29, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 3: 05-CV-1890-B (N.D. Tex. Mar. 29, 2006)