From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dalfio v. Secvd & I, Inc.

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Dec 15, 2021
21-cv-0929-MMA-AGS (S.D. Cal. Dec. 15, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-0929-MMA-AGS

12-15-2021

Victor DALFIO, Plaintiff, v. SECVD & I, INC., Does 1-10, Defendants.


SCHEDULING ORDER

REGULATING DISCOVERY

AND OTHER PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS

HON. ANDREW G. SCHOPLER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Under Local Civil Rule 16.1(d), a Case Management Conference was held on December 15, 2021. After consulting with the attorneys of record for the parties and being advised of the status of the case, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Any motion to join other parties, to amend the pleadings, or to file additional pleadings must be filed by December 17, 2021.

2. All fact discovery must be completed by all parties by May 6, 2022. “Completed” means that all discovery under Rules 30-36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and discovery subpoenas under Rule 45, must be initiated a sufficient period of time in advance of the cut-off date, so that it may be completed by the cut-off date, taking into account the times for service, notice and response as set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Counsel must promptly and in good faith meet and confer with regard to all discovery disputes in compliance with Local Rule 26.1(a). The Court expects counsel to make every effort to resolve all disputes without court intervention through the meet and confer process. If the parties reach an impasse on any discovery issue, counsel must file an appropriate motion within the time limit and procedures outlined in the undersigned magistrate judge's chambers rules. A failure to comply in this regard will result in a waiver of a party's discovery issue. Absent an order of the court, no stipulation continuing or altering this requirement will be recognized by the court.

3. During discovery, the parties will be limited to the following per-side restrictions:

DISCOVERY LIMITATIONS

Discovery Type

Restriction (Per Side)

Depositions

No. more than 4

Requests for Admission

No. more than 15

Interrogatories

No. more than 15

Requests to Produce Documents

No. more than 15

4. The parties must designate their respective experts in writing by March 11, 2022. The parties must identify any person who may be used at trial to present evidence pursuant to Rules 702, 703 or 705 of the Fed.R.Evid. This requirement is not limited to retained experts. The date for exchange of rebuttal experts must be by April 8, 2022. The written designations must include the name, address and telephone No. of the expert and a reasonable summary of the testimony the expert is expected to provide. The list must also include the normal rates the expert charges for deposition and trial testimony.

5. By March 11, 2022, each party must comply with the disclosure provisions in Rule 26(a)(2)(B) and (C) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This disclosure requirement applies to all persons retained or specially employed to provide expert testimony, or whose duties as an employee of the party regularly involve the giving of expert testimony. Except as provided in the paragraph below, any party that fails to make these disclosures will not, absent substantial justification, be permitted to use evidence or testimony not disclosed at any hearing or at the time of trial. In addition, the Court may impose sanctions as permitted by Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(c).

6. Any party must supplement its disclosure regarding contradictory or rebuttal evidence under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2)(D) by April 8, 2022.

7. All expert discovery must be completed by all parties by May 6, 2022. The parties must comply with the same procedures set forth in the paragraph governing fact discovery.

8. Failure to comply with this section or any other discovery order of the court may result in the sanctions provided for in Fed.R.Civ.P. 37, including a prohibition on the introduction of experts or other designated matters in evidence.

9. All dispositive pretrial motions, including motions for summary judgment and motions addressing Daubert issues, must be filed by June 10, 2022. Counsel for the moving party must obtain a motion hearing date from Judge Anello's law clerk. The period of time between the date you request a motion date and the hearing date may vary from one district judge to another. Please plan accordingly. Failure to make a timely request for a motion date may result in the motion not being heard.

This deadline is not applicable to pretrial motions in limine. For further information regarding motions in limine, please refer to Judge Anello's Civil Chambers Rules.

10. If appropriate, following the filing of an order ruling on a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive pretrial motion, or in the event no such motion is filed, after the expiration of the deadline set forth in paragraph 8, supra, Judge Anello will issue a pretrial scheduling order setting a pretrial conference, trial date, and all related pretrial deadlines. The parties must review and be familiar with Judge Anello's Civil Chambers Rules, which provide additional information regarding pretrial scheduling.

11. A Mandatory Settlement Conference will be conducted on May 31, 2022, at 9:00 a.m. in the chambers of Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler. Counsel or any party representing himself or herself must submit confidential settlement briefs directly to the magistrate judge's chambers by May 23, 2022. Each statement must outline the nature of the case, the claims, the defenses, the parties' settlement positions, and all MSC attendees for that side, including their names, titles, and positions. The settlement position must include a specific and current demand or offer addressing all relief or remedies sought. If a specific demand or offer cannot be made, then the reasons for this must be set forth. At their discretion, the parties may choose to share their statements with opposing counsel or to keep them confidential.

12. All parties and lead attorneys must appear in person at the MSC. A party that is a business, organization, or other entity must have at least two people appear in person at the MSC: (1) the party's representative (someone other than the lead attorney) who has full settlement authority and (2) its lead attorney. In addition, anyone else needed to authorize full settlement must appear in person. Government entities are excused from this personal-appearance requirement, so long as their lead attorney appears in person and has the power to recommend a resolution to the ultimate settlement authority. All participants must clear their schedules for the entirety of the day.

13. A post trial settlement conference before a magistrate judge may be held within 30 days of verdict in the case.

14. The dates and times set forth herein will not be modified except for good cause shown.

15. Briefs or memoranda in support of or in opposition to any pending motion must not exceed twenty-five (25) pages in length without leave of a district court judge. No. reply memorandum will exceed ten (10) pages without leave of a district court judge. Briefs and memoranda exceeding ten (10) pages in length must have a table of contents and a table of authorities cited.

16. Plaintiffs counsel must serve a copy of this order on all parties that enter this case hereafter.


Summaries of

Dalfio v. Secvd & I, Inc.

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Dec 15, 2021
21-cv-0929-MMA-AGS (S.D. Cal. Dec. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Dalfio v. Secvd & I, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Victor DALFIO, Plaintiff, v. SECVD & I, INC., Does 1-10, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Dec 15, 2021

Citations

21-cv-0929-MMA-AGS (S.D. Cal. Dec. 15, 2021)