Opinion
Argued January 28, 1896
Decided February 18, 1896
Charles E. Ide for appellant.
Theodore E. Hancock for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Dale v. City of Syracuse
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 18, 1896
43 N.E. 987 (N.Y. 1896)
Summaries of
Dale v. City of Syracuse
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 18, 1896
43 N.E. 987 (N.Y. 1896)
Case details for
Dale v. City of Syracuse
Case Details
Full title:WILLIAM DALE, Respondent, v . THE CITY OF SYRACUSE, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 18, 1896
Citations
43 N.E. 987 (N.Y. 1896)
148 N.Y. 750
Citing Cases
Lewis v. City of New York
The complaint having been dismissed at the close of plaintiff's proofs, the relations between the defendants…
Gille v. State of New YorkRather do we believe that the most that can be said under the evidence herein is that reasonable minds may…