Opinion
Nos. 14-03-01322-CR, 14-03-01323-CR, 14-03-01324-CR
Opinion filed May 27, 2004. DO NOT PUBLISH — Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b).
On Appeal from the 179th District Court Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. 877,563; 953,578 953,886. Affirmed.
Panel consists of Justices FOWLER, EDELMAN, and SEYMORE.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to two counts of aggravated robbery and one count of deadly conduct. On June 6, 2003, the trial court imposed sentence in the deadly conduct cause and sentenced appellant to 7 years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. On November 19, 2003, the trial court sentenced appellant in the aggravated robbery causes and imposed a sentence of confinement for 50 years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed pro se notices of appeal. Appellant's appointed counsel filed briefs in which he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The briefs meet the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the records demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). A copy of counsel's briefs were delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate records and file pro se responses. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991). As of this date, no pro se response has been filed. We have carefully reviewed the records and counsel's briefs and agree the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the briefs would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state. Accordingly, the judgments of the trial court are affirmed.