From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daily v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Dec 21, 1938
122 S.W.2d 629 (Tex. Crim. App. 1938)

Opinion

No. 20060.

Delivered December 21, 1938.

Passing a Forged Instrument — Appeal.

Refusal to quash indictment not error where instrument alleged to have been passed was in all respects the same as that described in Cause No. 20061, against same defendant (page 655 of this volume).

Appeal from the Criminal District Court of Tarrant County. Hon. W. M. McGregor, Judge.

Appeal from conviction for passing a forged instrument; penalty, confinement in penitentiary for two years.

Affirmed.

The opinion states the case.

Mays Mays, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


Conviction is for passing a forged instrument, punishment being assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

The instrument alleged to have been passed by appellant is in all respects the same as that described I cause No. 20061 against the same appellant, opinion of this date [page 655 of this volume]. In the present case motion to quash the indictment was overruled, said motion being based upon the same contention discussed in cause No. 20061.

We see no good reason for writing further. The same conclusion here follows as was reached in the other cause mentioned.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Daily v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Dec 21, 1938
122 S.W.2d 629 (Tex. Crim. App. 1938)
Case details for

Daily v. State

Case Details

Full title:BOB O. DAILY v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Dec 21, 1938

Citations

122 S.W.2d 629 (Tex. Crim. App. 1938)
122 S.W.2d 629