Dailey v. Allison

Full title: JAMES DAILEY, Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, Acting Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Apr 30, 2010

EDCV 08-1040 AG (SS) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2010)

Opinion

JAMES DAILEY, Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, Acting Warden, Respondent. No. EDCV 08-1040 AG (SS). United States District Court, C.D. California. April 30, 2010.

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

         LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.