From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dade County v. McCahill

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 4, 1959
114 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1959)

Opinion

No. 59-124.

August 24, 1959. Rehearing Denied September 4, 1959.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Ray Pearson, Judge.

Darrey A. Davis and Thomas C. Britton, Miami, for appellant.

Walter J. Migoski, Miami, for appellees.


The appeal in this case challenges that part of a judgment in eminent domain which is for certain attorney's fees allowed to the attorney for appellees, based on a directed verdict therefor. The facts and questions involved are similar to those raised and considered on the cross-appeal in Romy v. Dade County, Fla.App. 1959, 114 So.2d 8, decided this date. On authority of that case the judgment is reversed in part, that is, as to the allowance of such attorney fees, and the cause remanded for a new trial only as to the said attorney fees.

It is so ordered.

HORTON, C.J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dade County v. McCahill

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 4, 1959
114 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1959)
Case details for

Dade County v. McCahill

Case Details

Full title:DADE COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 4, 1959

Citations

114 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1959)