Daddona v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Full title: PAUL DADDONA ET AL. v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE CITY OF STAMFORD

Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Nov 1, 1966

223 A.2d 394 (Conn. 1966)

154 Conn. 728

Opinion

Milton Turkel, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Theodore Godlin, for the appellee (defendant).

Argued November 1, 1966

Decided November 1, 1966

It appearing that the plaintiffs in the above-entitled case have failed to prosecute their appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County at Stamford with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.