From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D'Adamo v. Artus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 23, 2009
61 A.D.3d 1263 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 505883.

April 23, 2009.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered September 18, 2008 in Clinton County, which denied petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Paul J. D'Adamo, Fishkill, appellant pro se.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Spain, Rose, Malone Jr. and Kavanagh, JJ.


Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 70 proceeding seeking a writ of habeas corpus, contending that he is being illegally held due to the Division of Parole's failure to assist with and/or approve housing necessary to facilitate his conditional release. Supreme Court refused to issue the writ and denied petitioner's application without a hearing. Petitioner now appeals.

We affirm. Entitlement to immediate release from prison, which does not occur until the expiration of an inmate's sentence, is a prerequisite for habeas corpus relief ( see People ex rel. Porter v Napoli, 56 AD3d 830, 831). Because petitioner is not entitled to any such immediate release in this case, Supreme Court properly denied petitioner's application ( see People ex rel. Land v State of New York, 54 AD3d 1113; People ex rel. Sansalone v Schriver, 252 AD2d 605).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

D'Adamo v. Artus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 23, 2009
61 A.D.3d 1263 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

D'Adamo v. Artus

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. PAUL J. D'ADAMO, Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 23, 2009

Citations

61 A.D.3d 1263 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 3086
876 N.Y.S.2d 912

Citing Cases

People ex rel. D'Amico v. Lilley

In addition, even if petitioner's claims were determined to have merit and his sentences were to run…

Mullady v. N.Y. State Dep't of Corr. & Cmty. Supervision

Additionally, Petitioner's argument that there are no state remedies available to him in his state habeas…