From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dacanay v. Sakamoto

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
May 1, 2014
SCPW-13-0004663 (Haw. May. 1, 2014)

Opinion

SCPW-13-0004663

05-01-2014

FELIX DACANAY AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROGER ROXAS and THE GOLDEN BUDHA CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, Petitioners, v. HONORABLE KARL K. SAKAMOTO, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, Respondent Judge, and CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI'I and IMELDA MARCOS AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF FERDINAND E. MARCOS and IMELDA MARCOS, INDIVIDUALLY, Respondents


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CIV. NO. 88-0522-02)


ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PETITION FOR

WRITS OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioners Felix Dacanay, as personal representative of the Estate of Roger Roxas, and The Golden Budha Corporation's petition for writs of mandamus or prohibition, filed on October 29, 2013, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that petitioners have failed to demonstrate that they do not have alternative means of seeking the requested relief. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writs of mandamus or prohibition is denied without prejudice.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, May 1, 2014.

Mark E. Recktenwald

Paula A. Nakayama

Sabrina S. McKenna

Richard W. Pollack

Michael D. Wilson


Summaries of

Dacanay v. Sakamoto

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
May 1, 2014
SCPW-13-0004663 (Haw. May. 1, 2014)
Case details for

Dacanay v. Sakamoto

Case Details

Full title:FELIX DACANAY AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROGER ROXAS and…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

Date published: May 1, 2014

Citations

SCPW-13-0004663 (Haw. May. 1, 2014)