From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cybulski v. Baldwin Locomotive Works

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 7, 1929
144 A. 768 (Pa. 1929)

Opinion

November 27, 1928.

January 7, 1929.

Workmen's compensation — Award — Evidence — Death following injury — Streptococcic septicemia following cellulitis of thumb.

An award for a workman's death will be sustained where it is found on sufficient evidence that on a particular morning he left home in good health, his hands in good condition; that at noon he complained to a fellow workman, a witness, of a scratch on his thumb saying that it was the result of removing a steel chip from his shoe; that the appearance of the wound, according to the witness, was "a little red, a hole"; that steel shavings were lying around at the place where he was working; that on returning home he complained to his wife of soreness of his thumb and informed her that the injury happened in the manner related to his fellow workman; and that he subsequently died of streptococcic septicemia following cellulitis of the thumb.

Before FRAZER, WALLING, SIMPSON, KEPHART, SADLER and SCHAFFER, JJ.

Appeal, No. 287, Jan. T., 1928, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1927, No. 11190, affirming decision of workmen's compensation board allowing claim, in case of Stefania Cybulski v. Baldwin Locomotive Works. Affirmed.

Appeal from award of workmen's compensation board allowing claim. Before LEWIS, J.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts.

Decision affirmed. Defendant appealed. Error assigned, inter alia, was judgment, quoting record.

Benjamin O. Frick, with him Evans, Bayard Frick, for appellant.

T. Henry Walnut, for appellee, was not heard.


Argued November 27, 1928.


Appellant objects to an award made against it by the workmen's compensation board, on the ground that no competent evidence is shown to sustain the finding that claimant's husband received the injury in the course of his employment, from which admittedly he subsequently died. The court below upheld the award and this appeal followed.

Decedent had been employed by appellant at its works for a number of years previous to his death. On the morning of October 21, 1926, he left home for work at the usual time in good health. Definite evidence was produced to the effect that his hands were both in good condition at that time. A fellow employee testified that at the noon hour decedent complained of a scratch on his left thumb, saying it was the result of removing a steel "chip" from his shoe. The witness described the appearance of the thumb as "a little red, a hole." He further testified that steel shavings and chips were lying around at the place where he and Cybulski were working. On returning to his home that evening, the latter complained of soreness of his thumb, and informed his wife the injury happened in the manner related above to his fellow workman. A doctor was called the following day. Cybulski died on November 6, 1926, as a result of "generalized streptococcic septicemia following cellulitis of the left thumb."

After careful reading of the record, we are convinced that, under the principles stated in Johnston v. Payne-Yost Construction Co., 292 Pa. 509, competent evidence was adduced to sustain the finding. The judgment of the court of common pleas sustaining the award must therefore be affirmed.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Cybulski v. Baldwin Locomotive Works

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 7, 1929
144 A. 768 (Pa. 1929)
Case details for

Cybulski v. Baldwin Locomotive Works

Case Details

Full title:Cybulski v. Baldwin Locomotive Works, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 7, 1929

Citations

144 A. 768 (Pa. 1929)
144 A. 768

Citing Cases

Ripani v. Dittman

As stated by him, in the absence of an autopsy, an expert could not say absolutely that gas caused the death,…