Summary
holding that the failure of a physician to include the information required in HRS § 386–96, including the dates of disability and the return to work date, violates HRS § 386–96 as an improper certification, and thus justifies a denial of the claimant's TTD benefits
Summary of this case from Panoke v. Reef Dev. of Haw., Inc.Opinion
No. CAAP–11–0000570.
2014-05-15
John E. CUSTINO, Jr., Claimant–Appellant, v. STATE of Hawai‘i, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Employer–Appellee/Self–Insured.
Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board (Case No. AB 2008–258 (2–02–40713)). Andrew A. Cheng, (Robinson & Chur), on the briefs, for Claimant–Appellant. Gary N. Kunihiro, Shawn L.M. Benton, (Leong Kunihiro Lezy & Benton), on the briefs, for Employer–Appellee, Self–Insured.