Curtiss , 2015 WL 728466, at *7, aff'd sub nom. Curtiss v. McCormally , 623 Fed.Appx. 826 (8th Cir.2015) (emphasis in original). Not only does Judge O'Brien highlight the distinction between Curtiss and these plaintiffs—Curtiss asked for direct release, these plaintiffs do not—Judge O'Brien seemingly anticipated the defendants' present argument and made clear that the Heck analysis would be different if the plaintiffs were broadly challenging IOWA CODE CH. 229A as applied.