From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curtis v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Sep 11, 2012
CIVIL NO. 11-463-SCW (S.D. Ill. Sep. 11, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 11-463-SCW

09-11-2012

TERRY CURTIS, Plaintiff, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant.


ORDER

WILLIAMS, Magistrate Judge:

The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above action has been settled but that additional time is needed to consummate the settlement, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment dismissing this action with prejudice and without costs 60 days from the date of this Order. Should the parties fail to consummate settlement within 60 days, they may petition the Court to delay entry of judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________________

STEPHEN C. WILLIAMS

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Curtis v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Sep 11, 2012
CIVIL NO. 11-463-SCW (S.D. Ill. Sep. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Curtis v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.

Case Details

Full title:TERRY CURTIS, Plaintiff, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Date published: Sep 11, 2012

Citations

CIVIL NO. 11-463-SCW (S.D. Ill. Sep. 11, 2012)