From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curtis v. Orchard Supply Hardware Stores Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 22, 2013
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01833-LJO-SMS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01833-LJO-SMS

02-22-2013

ALBERT GEORGE CURTIS, Plaintiff, v. ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE STORES CORPORATION; VISALIA PROPERTIES, a California General Partnership, Defendants.

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Benjamin M. Glickman Attorneys for Defendant ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE STORES CORPORATION GLASER WEIL FINK JACOBS HOWARD AVCHEN & SHAPIRO LLP Daniel Jordan Attorneys for Defendant VISALIA PROPERTIES MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. Tanya E. Moore Attorneys for Plaintiff ALBERT GEORGE CURTIS


GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
PETER S. MODLIN, SBN 151453
PModlin@gibsondunn.com
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 393-8200
Facsimile: (415) 393-8306
BENJAMIN M. GLICKMAN, SBN 247907
BGlickman@gibsondunn.com
1881 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 849-5300
Facsimile: (650) 849-5333
Attorneys for Defendant
ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE
STORES CORPORATION

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT;

ORDER THEREON


L.R. 143, 144


Action Filed: November 7, 2012

Pursuant to Local Rules 143 and 144, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiff Albert George Curtis ("Plaintiff"), Defendant Orchard Supply Hardware LLC ("Orchard"), and Defendant Visalia Properties ("Visalia" and, collectively with Orchard, "Defendants") stipulate and agree to extend the time for Visalia's response to Plaintiff's Complaint as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed his complaint in this action on November 7, 2012 (the "Complaint");

WHEREAS, Defendant Visalia Properties was served with the Complaint on January 7, 2013;

WHEREAS, on January 23, 2013, the parties stipulated, pursuant to Local Rule 144, to extend the time for Visalia's response to the Complaint by twenty-eight (28) days;

WHEREAS, absent an extension, Visalia's response to the Complaint is currently due on February 25, 2013;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Orchard are actively engaged in settlement discussions to resolve this matter on behalf of all parties;

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and have agreed that it is in the best interests of the parties, and in the interests of justice, to extend the time for Visalia to respond to the Complaint until March 4, 2013 to permit further settlement discussions while minimizing litigation expense;

WHEREAS, this extension will not alter any other date or deadline set by the Court;

WHEREAS, the parties agree that this stipulation does not waive any right of the parties to request further extensions from the Court;

IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT Visalia's time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be extended by seven (7) days to March 4, 2013. Nothing in this Stipulation shall be construed as a waiver of any of Plaintiffs' or Defendants' rights, defenses, or arguments they would otherwise have.

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

By: __

Benjamin M. Glickman

Attorneys for Defendant

ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE STORES

CORPORATION

GLASER WEIL FINK JACOBS HOWARD AVCHEN

& SHAPIRO LLP

By: __

Daniel Jordan

Attorneys for Defendant

VISALIA PROPERTIES

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

By: __

Tanya E. Moore

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ALBERT GEORGE CURTIS

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________

Hon. Sandra M. Snyder

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Curtis v. Orchard Supply Hardware Stores Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 22, 2013
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01833-LJO-SMS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Curtis v. Orchard Supply Hardware Stores Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT GEORGE CURTIS, Plaintiff, v. ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE STORES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 22, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01833-LJO-SMS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2013)