From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curtis v. Orchard Supply Hardware Stores Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 28, 2013
CASE NO. CV F 12-1833 LJO SMS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV F 12-1833 LJO SMS

02-28-2013

ALBERT GEORGE CURTIS, Plaintiff, v. ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE STORES CORP., et al., Defendants.


ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT

(Doc. 17.)

Plaintiff's counsel notified this Court that settlement has been reached among all parties. Pursuant to this Court's Local Rule 160, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than April 5, 2013, to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety, or to show good cause why the action has not been dismissed.

This Court VACATES all pending matters and dates, including the April 2, 2013 scheduling conference.

Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on counsel or parties who contributed to violation of this order. See Local Rules160 and 272. This Court ADMONISHES the parties and counsel that they must obey the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court's Local Rules and orders and are subject to sanctions as this Court deems appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Curtis v. Orchard Supply Hardware Stores Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 28, 2013
CASE NO. CV F 12-1833 LJO SMS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2013)
Case details for

Curtis v. Orchard Supply Hardware Stores Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT GEORGE CURTIS, Plaintiff, v. ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE STORES CORP.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 28, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. CV F 12-1833 LJO SMS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2013)