From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curtis v. Natalie Anthracite Coal Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 11, 1905
73 N.E. 1122 (N.Y. 1905)

Opinion

Argued March 17, 1905

Decided April 11, 1905

Martin Conboy, Arthur J. Baldwin and Leonard D. Baldwin for appellant.

George C. Austin for respondents.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on prevailing opinion below.

Concur: O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN and WERNER, JJ. Dissenting: CULLEN, Ch. J. Absent: GRAY, J.


Summaries of

Curtis v. Natalie Anthracite Coal Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 11, 1905
73 N.E. 1122 (N.Y. 1905)
Case details for

Curtis v. Natalie Anthracite Coal Company

Case Details

Full title:GROVE D. CURTIS et al., Respondents, v . NATALIE ANTHRACITE COAL COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 11, 1905

Citations

73 N.E. 1122 (N.Y. 1905)
181 N.Y. 543