From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curtis v. Fraser

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 8, 1990
554 So. 2d 3 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

Nos. 88-0947, 88-1533.

November 29, 1989. Rehearing Denied January 8, 1990.

Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Barbara Bridge, Judge.

Diane H. Tutt, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

John D. Kruse, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


AFFIRMED.

POLEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., dissents with opinion.


I believe the trial court was technically in error in granting a motion for involuntary dismissal where the plaintiff-appellant had presented a prima facie case of fraud. There is some proof in the record that the appellant was misled into believing she was purchasing an eight (8) unit motel. After the purchase, it was discovered that the eight units could not be lawfully used as separate motel rooms. Although it may appear silly and inefficient in a case like this, the rule is that a trial court must wait until the defendant has rested before evaluating or deciding the credibility of the plaintiff's evidence. See Panet v. Rexod, 345 So.2d 825 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).


Summaries of

Curtis v. Fraser

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 8, 1990
554 So. 2d 3 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Curtis v. Fraser

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA G. CURTIS, APPELLANT, v. AUDREY FRASER, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 8, 1990

Citations

554 So. 2d 3 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)