From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curtis v. Dep't of Revenue

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan 5, 2022
337 So. 3d 430 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 3D20-1767

01-05-2022

Antorius CURTIS, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, et al., Appellees.

Antorius Curtis, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General (Tallahassee), for appellee Department of Revenue.


Antorius Curtis, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General (Tallahassee), for appellee Department of Revenue.

Before LOGUE, HENDON, and GORDO, JJ.

HENDON, J. Based on the Department of Revenue's partial confession of error, we reverse that portion of the Final Administrative Paternity and Support Order, Child Support Guidelines Worksheet, and Income Deduction Order, and remand to the trial court for determination of Curtis's gross monthly income and to make any adjustments in child support if necessary. We affirm the remainder of the trial court's rulings.

Affirmed in part, reversed and remanded in part.


Summaries of

Curtis v. Dep't of Revenue

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan 5, 2022
337 So. 3d 430 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Curtis v. Dep't of Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Antorius CURTIS, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, et al., Appellees.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Jan 5, 2022

Citations

337 So. 3d 430 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)