Curtis v. Dep't of Revenue

Full title: Antorius Curtis, Appellant, v. Department of Revenue, et al., Appellees.

Court: Florida Court of Appeals, Third District

Date published: Jan 5, 2022

No. 3D20-1767 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 5, 2022)

Opinion

3D20-1767

01-05-2022

Antorius Curtis, Appellant, v. Department of Revenue, et al., Appellees.

Antorius Curtis, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General (Tallahassee), for appellee Department of Revenue.

HENDON, J.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

An Appeal from the State of Florida Department of Revenue Lower Tribunal Nos. 13200010782FC, CS 2001412179, DOAH 20-004273-CS.

Antorius Curtis, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General (Tallahassee), for appellee Department of Revenue.

Before LOGUE, HENDON, and GORDO, JJ.

HENDON, J.

Based on the Department of Revenue's partial confession of error, we reverse that portion of the Final Administrative Paternity and Support Order, Child Support Guidelines Worksheet, and Income Deduction Order, and remand to the trial court for determination of Curtis's gross monthly income and to make any adjustments in child support if necessary. We affirm the remainder of the trial court's rulings.

Affirmed in part, reversed and remanded in part.