From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curtis v. Brunsman

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jul 14, 2009
Civil Action 2:08-CV-391 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 14, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:08-CV-391.

July 14, 2009


ORDER


On June 4, 2009, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that petitioner's motion for summary judgment be denied and that this action be dismissed. The parties were specifically advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so. There has nevertheless been no objection to the Report and Recommendation.

The Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. The petitioner's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. This action is hereby DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Curtis v. Brunsman

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jul 14, 2009
Civil Action 2:08-CV-391 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 14, 2009)
Case details for

Curtis v. Brunsman

Case Details

Full title:JAMEL D. CURTIS, Petitioner, v. TIMOTHY BRUNSMAN, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jul 14, 2009

Citations

Civil Action 2:08-CV-391 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 14, 2009)